The vulnerabilities your tools don't catch.
Most SMEs run free-tier scanners and trust the team's code review. One can't afford more; the other doesn't know what it's missing. Both leave the same gap.
- probing auth flows
- tracing token lifecycle
- chaining cors + expiry
- exploit path confirmed
- detector scoring…
- HIGHJWT verified without expiry checkauth.js:42
- HIGHWildcard CORS on authenticated routeserver.js:23
- MEDDB credentials in committed configconfig/db.js:7
- LOWVerbose stack traces in productionapp.js:118
The problem
You don't know what you're missing.
Scanners match patterns, not intent
A free-tier scanner flags a known CVE signature. It cannot reason about a token that validates correctly but never expires, because nothing in that code looks wrong on its own.
Code review trusts the author
Your reviewer reads the diff the way it was meant to be read. An attacker reads it looking for the path you did not consider — and chains two safe-looking changes into one exploit.
The gap only shows up in a breach
Nothing in your dashboard reports the vulnerability nobody tested for. By the time the finding has a date attached, it has a cost attached too.
How it works
Attack it before someone else does.
You book a consultation
We scope the engagement to the repository and domain you register, and you sign a consent agreement covering exactly what we will touch. Nothing runs before that.
The attacker agent works your code
It reads the repository for injection vectors, committed secrets, and insecure defaults, then probes the deployed app one category at a time — strictly inside your registered domain.
The detector scores every action
A second agent watches every probe and classifies what actually broke. You get two reports: one technical, one written for a business owner.
Find them before an attacker does.
Every engagement starts with a consultation. We scope it, you consent to it, then we run it.